Shincheonji lesson 42: figurative new wine and new wineskins

Lesson 42 · Introductory

Based on the full Closer Look lesson study

Main verses used

Links open the NET Bible.

What SCJ teaches

This section comes from class notes that an attendee wrote down during SCJ’s 9-month Bible study seminar, posted with the full Closer Look study. They are not SCJ’s printed curriculum, so the wording is the note-taker’s.

The meanings on the board

The board reads “Wine = The Word,” “Vine = Pastor and the chosen people,” “New Wine = New Revealed Word,” and new wineskins are “The promised Sheperd and his disciples.” The hope is “New wineskin! Avoid Maddening wine!” Revelation 6:6, where the oil and the wine are not to be harmed, is the main reference.

Vine, wine and wineskin

A vineyard grows vines, vines bear grapes, and grapes become wine. In John 15:1, Jesus is “the true vine,” so the vine’s “primary meaning” is “a pastor,” and the disciples are branches. Isaiah 5 adds a second meaning, the chosen people, who bore bad grapes. Their bad fruit, from Matthew 7:15-20, “was their words, actions, and the people they were producing.”

From Isaiah 55:1-3, wine is the word, and “To buy means to listen.” Isaiah 25:6 promises the finest wine on a mountain. A wineskin is a container, and “A person’s heart is supposed to be a container.” In Luke 5:37-39, new wine bursts old skins, and the notes explain why: “the old wineskins, those people, refuse to let go of the old.” Paul counted his credentials as loss (Philippians 3), and the teacher acknowledges the strain: “to receive a new word every single class, sometimes it can be a little bit exhausting, isn’t it?” The answer is “it is the process that we have to go through to be renewed.”

Old and new at each coming

At the first coming, the old wine was the law of Moses (John 1:17), the old wineskins were the priests, the new wine was Jesus’ revealed word of Old Testament prophecy and fulfillment, and the new wineskins were Jesus and the twelve. Hearers had to decide: “Do I continue with those who have always been teaching me the law? Or do I go with this new one who is bringing something new?” The disciples “had to dump out all the old word to make room for the new word.”

At the second coming, “what defines something as new wine or old wine is time.” The old wine is the gospel of the first coming, which has an important role, since “without the old wine, we wouldn’t know about Christ in the first place.” The old wineskins are “The pastors of today,” whose word has become “slightly corrupted, a little bit distorted” under Satan’s influence. The new wine is “the New Testament, the prophecies, and their fulfillment,” promised at the Last Supper (Luke 22:18; Matthew 26:29). The new wineskins are “New John and Us!” The summary adds, “Old wine is not bad; it’s just old.”

Maddening wine

Wild vines make poison wine (Deuteronomy 32:32-33), and Babylon made the nations drunk (Jeremiah 51:7). At the first coming, this was the Pharisees’ teaching. At the second coming, the prostitute of Revelation 17-18 makes all nations drunk, “which means there are no exceptions.” The wine, the teacher says, is “A little term called commentaries.” The instruction follows: “if you have a study Bible, toss it.” The way to stay sober is “to only receive the pure revealed word and not men’s thoughts.”

In SCJ’s own books

Each passage was checked against the scanned page image; page numbers are as printed.

The Explanation of Parables (Shincheonji), page 66, gives the true meaning of wine as “Word (doctrine).” Page 67 lists the results: “New wine (revealed word) → Heaven,” “Old wine (doctrines of traditions) → Hell,” and “Wine of adulteries (doctrines of Satan) → Hell.” For the second coming it says:

“The wine of adulteries at the Second Coming is the false doctrines (commentaries) that the false shepherd (the prostitute) received after having a relationship with Satan.”

Page 68 defines the wineskin as “A person who has the word (a person’s heart).” Page 69 lists “Old wineskin (shepherds of the churches of tradition) → Hell” and says:

“The new wineskins are the shepherds promised in the New Testament (the one who overcomes and the new priests of the Twelve Tribes) who testify to the revealed word of the New Testament’s fulfillment (Rv 10).”

How the lesson notes compare with the books

  • Wine = word, wineskin = heart, maddening wine = commentaries. Same teaching (notes; Parables pp. 66-69).
  • Old wine. Difference. The notes say “Old wine is not bad; it’s just old,” and that it has an important role. The book lists “Old wine (doctrines of traditions) → Hell” (Parables p. 67).
  • Who the new wineskins are. Same direction. The notes say “New John and Us!” The book says “the one who overcomes and the new priests of the Twelve Tribes” (Parables p. 69).

What the Bible says

  • Jesus told the new wine parable to answer a question about fasting while the bridegroom was present. Then they said to him, “John’s disciples frequently fast and pray, and so do the disciples of the Pharisees, but yours continue to eat and drink.” So Jesus said to them, “You cannot make the wedding guests fast while the bridegroom is with them, can you? But those days are coming, and when the bridegroom is taken from them, at that time they will fast.” (Luke 5:33-35, NET)
  • Jesus calls himself the vine and his followers the branches. “I am the vine; you are the branches. The one who remains in me—and I in him—bears much fruit because apart from me you can accomplish nothing. (John 15:5, NET)
  • John contrasts the law with grace and truth, not with grace and peace. For the law was given through Moses, but grace and truth came about through Jesus Christ. (John 1:17, NET)
  • Jesus said the same gospel of the kingdom would go to all nations before the end. And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached throughout the whole inhabited earth as a testimony to all the nations, and then the end will come. (Matthew 24:14, NET)
  • Jude calls the faith something entrusted once for all. Dear friends, although I have been eager to write to you about our common salvation, I now feel compelled instead to write to encourage you to contend earnestly for the faith that was once for all entrusted to the saints. (Jude 1:3, NET)
  • Paul warns against any gospel different from the one first preached, even from an angel. But even if we (or an angel from heaven) should preach a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be condemned to hell! (Galatians 1:8, NET)
  • Proverbs 31 names its speaker as King Lemuel. The words of King Lemuel, an oracle that his mother taught him: (Proverbs 31:1, NET)

Where SCJ’s reading conflicts with the Bible

This lesson defines wine as the word, the vine as “Pastor and the chosen people,” new wine as “New Revealed Word,” and new wineskins as the promised shepherd and his disciples. It says that at the second coming the old wine is the gospel of the first coming, the old wineskins are “The pastors of today,” and the new wineskins are “New John and Us!” It calls commentaries the maddening wine of Babylon and tells students, “if you have a study Bible, toss it.” The notes say “Old wine is not bad; it’s just old,” but SCJ’s The Explanation of Parables (p. 67) lists “Old wine (doctrines of traditions) → Hell,” and “Old wineskin (shepherds of the churches of tradition) → Hell” (p. 69). Jesus’ own new wine parable, read in its setting, doesn’t support any of this.

  1. 1. Luke 5: The new wine parable is about Jesus’ presence

    The lesson uses Luke 5:37-39 to say old wineskins are people who “refuse to let go of the old.”

    • Read why Jesus told the parable. People asked why his disciples didn’t fast like John’s disciples and the Pharisees’ (Luke 5:33). Jesus answered: “You cannot make the wedding guests fast while the bridegroom is with them, can you?” (5:34).
    • The new wine is the joy and newness of the kingdom arriving in Jesus himself, the bridegroom. Old religious forms, like the Pharisees’ fasting routines, couldn’t contain it.
    • Jesus ends: “No one after drinking old wine wants the new, for he says, ‘The old is good enough’” (5:39). He was describing people who preferred their traditions to him.
    • The parable isn’t a template for replacing the gospel of Jesus with a newer revealed word later.
  2. 2. The vine is Jesus; the vineyard is Israel

    The lesson says the vine’s “primary meaning” is “a pastor.”

    • Jesus says, “I am the vine; you are the branches” (John 15:5). The vine is Jesus himself, not a pastor. (See Lesson 17.)
    • Isaiah explains his own vineyard: “Israel is the vineyard of the Lord of Heaven’s Armies,” and the people of Judah are the planting he delighted in (Isaiah 5:7).
  3. 3. The disciples didn’t “dump out all the old word”

    The lesson says the disciples “had to dump out all the old word to make room for the new word.”

    • Jesus said, “Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets. I have not come to abolish these things but to fulfill them” (Matthew 5:17).
    • After the resurrection, he explained himself “beginning with Moses and all the prophets” (Luke 24:27). The apostles preached Jesus from the Old Testament (Acts 2:16-36; 17:2-3).
    • Paul told Timothy that “Every scripture is inspired by God and useful” (2 Timothy 3:16), including the Scriptures Timothy had known from infancy (3:15).
    • The disciples didn’t empty out the Scriptures. They saw them fulfilled in Jesus. (See Lesson 20 and Lesson 32 on Philippians 3.)
  4. 4. The gospel doesn’t become “old wine”

    The lesson says that at the second coming, the old wine is the gospel of the first coming, and “what defines something as new wine or old wine is time.”

    • Jude calls it “the faith that was once for all entrusted to the saints” (Jude 3). It doesn’t expire.
    • Jesus said “this gospel of the kingdom will be preached throughout the whole inhabited earth … and then the end will come” (Matthew 24:14). The same gospel goes out until the end.
    • “Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever!” (Hebrews 13:8).
    • “even if we (or an angel from heaven) should preach a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be condemned to hell!” (Galatians 1:8). A newer message that supersedes the gospel is exactly what Paul warned against.
  5. 5. Old wine: Not bad, or leading to hell?

    • The notes say “Old wine is not bad; it’s just old,” and that “without the old wine, we wouldn’t know about Christ in the first place.”
    • SCJ’s book says: “Old wine (doctrines of traditions) → Hell,” and “Old wineskin (shepherds of the churches of tradition) → Hell” (The Explanation of Parables pp. 67, 69).
    • Students are told the gospel they already have is fine, just old. SCJ’s book says it leads to hell. Those aren’t the same teaching.
  6. 6. “The pastors of today” are called old wineskins

    The lesson says the old wineskins are “The pastors of today,” whose word has become “slightly corrupted, a little bit distorted” under Satan’s influence.

    • This labels every pastor outside the course as Satan-influenced, without any specific evidence.
    • Scripture’s test of a teacher is whether they confess Jesus as the Christ come in the flesh (1 John 4:2), preach the same gospel (Galatians 1:8) and bear good fruit (Matthew 7:16).
  7. 7. Matthew 26:29: Jesus drinks it new with his disciples

    The Explanation of Parables (p. 67) says the new wine of Matthew 26:29 “is the revealed word of the fulfillment of the New Testament,” which Jesus gives “to the promised shepherd.”

    • Jesus said: “from now on I will not drink of this fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father’s kingdom” (26:29).
    • It’s Jesus’ promise to share the feast personally with his disciples when the kingdom comes in full, the “wedding celebration of the Lamb” (Revelation 19:9). (See Lesson 41.)
    • No promised shepherd is in the verse.
  8. 8. “New John and Us!”

    The lesson says the new wineskins are “New John and Us!” SCJ’s book says “the one who overcomes and the new priests of the Twelve Tribes” (The Explanation of Parables p. 69).

    • John himself took and ate the little scroll in Revelation 10 and prophesied (10:9-11; 22:8). (See Lesson 39.)
    • In Jesus’ parable, the new wineskins aren’t a specific leader and organization. They’re the fitting container for the new life Jesus brings.
  9. 9. Commentaries and “if you have a study Bible, toss it”

    The lesson says Babylon’s maddening wine is “A little term called commentaries,” and “if you have a study Bible, toss it.” SCJ’s book says the wine of adulteries is “the false doctrines (commentaries)” (The Explanation of Parables p. 67).

    • Revelation says: “all the nations have fallen from the wine of her immoral passion” (18:3). Babylon’s wine is her immorality and idolatry, the seduction of a world power (17:2; 18:3, 9). Commentaries aren’t mentioned.
    • Scripture shows God’s people helped by explanations: when Ezra read the law, the Levites “read from the book of God’s law, explaining it and imparting insight. Thus the people gained understanding” (Nehemiah 8:8). Priscilla and Aquila “explained the way of God to him more accurately” to Apollos (Acts 18:26). God gave the church teachers (Ephesians 4:11).
    • A study Bible’s cross-references, maps and notes on the original languages are exactly the tools that let a student check the course’s claims. Telling students to throw them away removes the means of testing.
    • SCJ’s own books are commentaries on the Bible. By the course’s own standard, they’d be maddening wine too. (See Lesson 15.)
  10. 10. All nations and “no exceptions”

    The lesson says the prostitute makes all nations drunk, “which means there are no exceptions.”

    • If there are no exceptions, the course and its sources aren’t exempt either.
    • And Revelation itself names exceptions: those whose names are written in the Lamb’s book of life (13:8; 17:8).
  11. 11. Choosing “this new one”

    The lesson frames the first-coming choice as: “Do I continue with those who have always been teaching me the law? Or do I go with this new one who is bringing something new?”

    • At the first coming, “this new one” was Jesus himself, the Son of God who fulfilled the Scriptures and rose from the dead (Romans 1:4).
    • Applying the same choice today to a new human messenger puts that messenger in Jesus’ place. Paul rebukes the Corinthians because “if someone comes and proclaims another Jesus different from the one we proclaimed … or a different gospel than the one you accepted, you put up with it well enough!” (2 Corinthians 11:4).
  12. 12. A course that’s “exhausting” isn’t a sign of renewal

    The class admits that “to receive a new word every single class, sometimes it can be a little bit exhausting,” and calls that “the process that we have to go through to be renewed.”

    • Jesus describes his way differently: “Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest … my yoke is easy to bear, and my load is not hard to carry” (Matthew 11:28-30). (See Lesson 32.)
    • Exhaustion from constant new definitions is a reason to slow down and test, not proof of growth.

What the lesson is really for

This lesson relabels the gospel and the student’s church:

  • The gospel of the first coming is now “old wine.”
  • Today’s pastors are old wineskins, distorted by Satan.
  • The new wine is the revealed word of fulfillment, and the new wineskins are “New John and Us!”
  • Commentaries are Babylon’s wine, so toss your study Bible.
  • SCJ’s book says old wine and old wineskins lead to hell.

The biblical answer: The new wine is the life of the kingdom arriving in Jesus the bridegroom (Luke 5:33-39). The vine is Jesus (John 15:5). The gospel was “once for all entrusted to the saints” (Jude 3) and will be preached to all nations until the end (Matthew 24:14). Babylon’s wine is her immorality (Revelation 18:3). And God’s people have always been helped by faithful explanation of Scripture (Nehemiah 8:8; Acts 18:26).

What’s happening behind the lesson

These notes are our reading of the lesson text, using Steven Hassan’s BITE model (behavior, information, thought and emotional control). They describe what the text does, not the teacher’s intent. Hassan notes that not every group uses every item. Source: Steven Hassan, BITE Model, Freedom of Mind.

  • Information: can limit trust in other teaching (our reading). Commentaries are the maddening wine, “if you have a study Bible, toss it,” and the old wineskins are “The pastors of today.” In our reading, the warning points students away from their own pastors and reference books.
  • Thought: can create pressure to choose one of two groups. “Do I continue with those who have always been teaching me the law? Or do I go with this new one,” and the disciples “had to dump out all the old word.”
  • Emotional: can turn strain into a sign of growth. The class admits the course can be “exhausting,” then frames that as “the process that we have to go through to be renewed.” Feeling unsettled is presented as progress.

Go deeper

Scripture quotations are from the NET Bible. Bible Vaccine Center and Closer Look Initiative are run by the same team.